IAEA Report Confirms Iran’s ‘Bomb Work’ – Not So Inconclusive as some would like to believe

With news of billions of dollars in potential investments dominating the headlines on Iran in the media these days, it’s easy to forget other aspects of the nuclear deal – such as the international inspections of Iran’s nuclear sites, and Iran’s obligation to cooperate with international probes and reports.

But this week, the headlines were dominated by the latest report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), investigating the possibility of past Iranian military nuclear activity – in other words, whether or not Iran had pursued a nuclear bomb.

The report, required under the nuclear deal and based on data disclosed by Iran, was to have revealed – once and for all – whether or not Iran had pursued work related to nuclear weapons in the past. But earlier this week, IAEA head Yukiya Amano announced that the report would not be conclusive on the issue of nuclear weapons – “not black and white.”

Media responses were not long in coming. Reuters asserted that the “murky” verdict on the “possible military dimensions” (PMD) of Iran’s nuclear program would make it easier for the deal to proceed, despite the “overall credible” intelligence on which suspicions of PMD were based. AP, meanwhile, went a step further, suggesting that since “Tehran has warned it might renege [on the deal] if the IAEA report is stacked against it,” the inconclusive results can be read as a signal from Washington that it is “prepared to shut an eye.”

As the fine print of the report was disclosed, the headlines highlighting – or analyzing – Amano’s statement were cast aside in favor of more substantial, dramatic news: that evidence of military nuclear activity – or “bomb-relevant work,” to cite The Huffington Post/Reuters – was found by the IAEA. The New York Times, meanwhile, opened its report on the matter with the sentence, “Iran was actively designing a nuclear weapon until 2009, more recently than the United States and other Western intelligence agencies have publicly acknowledged.”

While most reports explained in greater detail in later paragraphs that this activity ceased more than five years ago, and was only in the preliminary stages, we question why the IAEA released its “inconclusive” statement to begin with – seemingly throwing the media off the evidence that was actually found. Evidently, this time, the media was hot on the trail.

Blogging & updating on #Iran related news- focusing on Politics, Human Rights & the Iranian nuclear Program. Followed by top Middle East Analysts, Reportes & think tanks.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Iranian Nuclear Crisis, Iranian Politics, Media Coverage, nuclear talks

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us in any way you like!
  Like on FacebookFollow on Twitterstumble uponFlickrPinterest

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42,567 other followers

Visuals to Share
Visitor Count
  • 562,867
Follow us on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: