Iran’s Imperial Campaign

Iran and its supporters often go on about the scourge of American “imperialism,” and Iran famously executed the leader of its Jewish community in 1979 on charges of “economic imperialism.” The assumption implicit in this rhetoric is that “imperialism” can only apply to Western state actors, and that any such activity taking place in the Middle East can unwaveringly be traced back to the US or another Western power – while Iran and its proxies stand out as “anti-imperial paragons.”

But it is becoming increasingly apparent to the world – and to the Western press along with it – that Iranian imperialism is a key factor. For months, we have been noting how the threat of Iranian imperialism has been downplayed by the media (just like the danger of a nuclear Iran), with reporters such as The Huffington Post’s Graham E. Fuller and Paul Pillar of The National Interest dismissing it as “much hyped,” “overstretched,” or “supposedly threatening.”

As early as 2012, however, we singled outlets and reporters out for telling Iran like it is – a “revolutionary state” with imperialist designs and a “Shi’a missionary overlay,” not a “status quo power seeking acceptance in the global order,” to cite Robert Manning. And lately, with civil war- and ISIS-induced chaos raging in Syria, Iraq, and, most recently, Yemen (where Iran has been playing a Great Game), Tehran’s increasingly military involvement in its neighbors’ affairs and the benefits it has reaped from the region’s instability have made even more evident that in the Middle East, imperialism “lives on, but not as a Western conceit.”

This dawning understanding has been reflected in the media as well, with plenty of articles centering in recent weeks on Iran’s quest for domination – and possibly empire. From a Commentary Magazine piece in which Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was dubbed “the most successful imperialist in the history of modern Iran,” to a Foreign Policy op-ed by James Stavridis on “Imperial Iran” seeking to “expand” its borders by “pushing aggressively against neighbors in the region,” to another FP analysis – this one by Robert Kaplan – suggesting that Iran is poised to “inherit the void left by the disappearance of Ottoman, European, and American empires,” news outlets have been actively recognizing and addressing “the broad campaign of Iranian imperial activity.”

If nothing else, according to Stavridis, these shows of awareness go one step towards reassuring the West’s “increasingly nervous allies” in the Middle East – for whom an Iran seeking to export its religious revolution is hardly just “supposedly” threatening.

Blogging & updating on #Iran related news- focusing on Politics, Human Rights & the Iranian nuclear Program. Followed by top Middle East Analysts, Reportes & think tanks.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Iranian Foreign Relations, Iranian Politics, Khamenei
2 comments on “Iran’s Imperial Campaign
  1. […] his speech, Obama downplayed Iran’s regional ambitions, predicting that Iran simply “will remain a regional power” (and terror sponsor) rather than […]

  2. […] of Iranian troops we now know to be active in Iran, can Iran’s “regional interventionism” in Syria and elsewhere, as Rafizadeh describes it, still be ascribed to a “defensive” policy – fighting in Syria in […]

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us in any way you like!
  Like on FacebookFollow on Twitterstumble uponFlickrPinterest

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38,316 other followers

Visuals to Share
Visitor Count
  • 1,384,675
Follow us on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: