Iran’s New Taliban Ties Belie ‘Commitment’ To Stability

It’s common knowledge that Iran has ties to Shi’ite militias fighting ISIS in Iraq, while recently additional reports by EIFA iraq-malikis-gangs-unseat-sunnis  may suggest that Iran may even be strengthening ISIS in order to contribute to the mayhem in Iraq. It is also common knowledge that Iran supports the Assad regime, fighting to violently retain its despotic grip over a disintegrating Syria. A recent report in The Irish Times titled iranian-support-of-assad-regime-in-syria-amounts-to-billions reveals more about the scope of this support. Their involvement in Yemen does not need further elaboration.

But now, apparently, Iran is involved in military conflicts destabilizing the region in a new way (through proxies, naturally) – by supporting, of all groups, the fundamentalist Sunni Taliban.

According to a recent and widely-cited report by The Wall Street Journal, the Taliban – which itself finds its origins in mujahideen armed and trained to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan – is now “quietly” being recruited, equipped, and trained by Iran to counter ISIS. Taliban commanders in Afghanistan told the news outlet that they are receiving salaries, guns and sponsorship from Iran (which is clearly making good use of its funds amid high inflation rates).

Iran’s new strategy, which is reportedly meant to counter both US and ISIS threats/influence, does not give a thought to maintaining Afghanistan’s fragile stability (in fact, it actively assists the Taliban in its bid to return to power) – and belies Tehran’s so-called commitment to the stability of another region, the Middle East.

This development doesn’t bode well for the nuclear agreement, either, as WSJ pointed out – “potentially setting up a new regional dynamic in which Tehran, unfettered by punitive economic sanctions and flush with new resources, would be able to pursue an activist agenda through its proxies in and around the Middle East.”

The Taliban may be the jihadist rivals of the Islamic State, but are they really that different? Is one jihadist group better than the other? And can the Middle East and surrounding regions ever be truly stable while these murderous militant groups (and plenty of others, many of them Iranian proxies) race to out-arm and out-fight each other, undermining (or outright destroying) the area’s sovereign states?

Blogging & updating on #Iran related news- focusing on Politics, Human Rights & the Iranian nuclear Program. Followed by top Middle East Analysts, Reportes & think tanks.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Iranian Foreign Relations, Iranian Politics, IRGC, Media Coverage, Military
One comment on “Iran’s New Taliban Ties Belie ‘Commitment’ To Stability
  1. […] has not prevented Iran from deploying Afghanis to fight in Syria on its behalf, while forging new ties with the Taliban). Or the demolition of yet another Baha’i cemetery in Iranian Kurdistan. And what is worse, even […]

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us in any way you like!
  Like on FacebookFollow on Twitterstumble uponFlickrPinterest

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38,316 other followers

Visuals to Share
Visitor Count
  • 1,384,669
Follow us on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: