Indifference to the US-Iran debate

The nuclear talks between Iran and the six world powers resume on March 5 in an atmosphere both strained and heavily charged: the debate over US President Barack Obama’s Iran policy is still raging, Iran is still ranting about the Islamic State’s “Western creators” while arming militias from Lebanon to Iraq and in the thick of it all, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrived in Washington to tell Congress the agreement currently on the negotiating table is not just a “bad” deal, but a “very bad” one, one the world is better off without.

Now, with said agreement, or at least a framework for one, actually within reach, the press is pulling out all the stops and revealing exactly what it thinks of the whole affair: the months-long talks, the Western approach to them and what Iran really hopes to get out of it all. On the heels of every report of “progress” come reports of yet more concessions, shrouding the talks in even more controversy and eliciting yet more ominous warnings of “the potential catastrophe of the emerging deal” and “the end of nonproliferation” from conservative commentators.

Israeli PM Netanyahu at the congress this week

 

But not everyone sees the deal (impending or otherwise) as, well, such a big deal. Reporting from Istanbul, the International Business Times’s Erin Banco wrote that in the Middle East, the immediacy of the Iranian threat pales in comparison to that of ISIS (we wonder what Saudi Arabia has to say about that). And on Vox, Max Fisher wrote a lengthy analysis of the “real” motivations behind Iran’s push for a deal that would still allow it to retain some nuclear capacity. The bottom line? Iran does want nukes, but only as a deterrent (against the United States and even Iraq, which Iran now seems well on the way to controlling – by military means), only to increase its regional influence (as if it isn’t doing well enough on that front already), and never to attack anyone. Even this generous analysis of Iran is far from Tehran’s claim of developing nuclear energy for civilian use only and will still find it difficult to explain the nuclear warhead capability of the  ICBMs, which are not “on the negotiation table” at all.

Blogging & updating on #Iran related news- focusing on Politics, Human Rights & the Iranian nuclear Program. Followed by top Middle East Analysts, Reportes & think tanks.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Iranian Foreign Relations, Iranian Nuclear Crisis, Iranian Politics, Media Coverage, nuclear talks

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us in any way you like!
  Like on FacebookFollow on Twitterstumble uponFlickrPinterest

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42,623 other followers

Visuals to Share
Visitor Count
  • 664,254
Follow us on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: