Is the Nuke Deadlock ‘According To Plan’ For Iran?

You already know (and not just because we’ve told you) that the talks between the P5+1 and Iran over a final-status nuclear agreement have been extended yet again. But why did the negotiations break down despite statements by US Secretary of State John Kerry and others, including the Iranian team, reflecting more progress and fewer gaps?

Foreign Policy’s Aaron David Miller and Jason Brodsky have some ideas. The two suggested in a recent column that the “close-but-no-cigar” conclusion of a year of talks was a consequence of four “faulty assumptions” that led US negotiators to believe a deal was possible: that President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javad Zarif had the power to cut a bargain (they don’t – they are on Ayatollah Khamenei’s “retractable leash”); that Iran needs a deal (not that badly); that Iran would choose its interests over its pride (Khamenei wouldn’t, surely); and that if Iran can’t get what it wants, it will settle for what it needs (not quite).

Elsewhere on the web, it appeared that the belief that Iran had benefited from the extension (or at least had a “really, really, really good nuke week”) was common to many Western pundits.

AFP recently attributed the failure to the gaps that persist between the two sides – gaps that, with the Republicans poised to take over both houses of Congress and with Iranian hardliners waiting in the wings, are only growing wider. But The Wall Street Journal had a more sinister take on things, suggesting that the hardliners’ intensifying efforts to “sabotage” and “undercut” the talks likely contributed to the deadlock.

Over at Dallas News, Michael Rubin opined that the impasse was “according to plan” for the Islamic Republic – which he said was more concerned with “winning concessions and relieving pressure on Iran’s moribund economy” than with actually sealing the deal.

And indeed, the Iranian nuclear negotiators were praised back home for standing their ground in the face of Western “bullying” and “deception” – according to some reports, by shouting so loudly that the bodyguards outside the negotiation room had to rush inside, alarmed. Were these Iranian diplomats excited by the prospect of a deal, or by the prospect that there wouldn’t be one?

Blogging & updating on #Iran related news- focusing on Politics, Human Rights & the Iranian nuclear Program. Followed by top Middle East Analysts, Reportes & think tanks.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Hassan Rouhani, Iranian Foreign Relations, Iranian Nuclear Crisis, Iranian Politics, Khamenei, Media Coverage, Mohammad Javad Zarif, nuclear talks

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us in any way you like!
  Like on FacebookFollow on Twitterstumble uponFlickrPinterest

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38,316 other followers

Visuals to Share
Visitor Count
  • 1,384,554
Follow us on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: