The Great Nuclear (Non) Debate

Iran’s election campaign is heating up. Beyond the weekend debate, in a broader sense the past week’s declarations have been quite an eye opener.

The media was all over it, for sure.  But from our point of view, the “news” coming out of the debate is not that Rouhani and Velayati attacked Jalili – they’re running for office, after all – but the common denominator among them all:  an unwavering commitment to reaching the nuclear threshold and beyond. Let’s take a closer look.

Ali Akbar Velayati:

 “Well, Dr. Jalili, speaking of diplomacy, it’s not a philosophy class to say that our logic was strong,” said Velayati, responding to Jalili’s efforts to defend his performance. “You have been in charge of the nuclear issue, we have not made a step forward, and the [sanctions] pressure has been exerted on the people.”

And

Velayati portrayed the talks in Almaty as wasted opportunities for Iran, hinting that Jalili should have accepted the offer as an interim step.

Hassan Rouhani:

“All of our problems stem from this – that we didn’t make the utmost effort to prevent the [nuclear] dossier from going to the UN Security Council,” Mr. Rohani said.

And

“We suspended it? We mastered the (nuclear) technology!” The 64-year-old argued the Islamic Republic had expanded uranium enrichment during his tenure while demonstrating the program’s peaceful nature and preventing a US military attack.

“We didn’t allow Iran to be attacked.”

The campaign declarations indicate a clear attempt to mesh the nuclear and economic issues. But when decoupled, observers are left with the inescapable sense that what the candidates actually want is to continue advancing the nuclear program while avoiding the consequences – whether diplomatic resolutions, political isolation, economic pressure or the threat of force.

It won’t wash.

Blogging & updating on #Iran related news- focusing on Politics, Human Rights & the Iranian nuclear Program. Followed by top Middle East Analysts, Reportes & think tanks.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Hassan Rouhani, Iranian elections, Iranian Financial Sanctions, Iranian Nuclear Crisis, Iranian Politics, Khamenei, Other News
3 comments on “The Great Nuclear (Non) Debate
  1. […] The Great Nuclear (Non) Debate […]

  2. […] short-lived — nuclear negotiator between 2003 and 2005,” while the historical fact (by his own admission) is that he pretended to be cooperative while deceiving his western […]

  3. […] not the most startling of revelations – readers of this blog would have noticed the attention given to Rouhani (forget SEO, can we have spelling uniformity, please?) throughout the campaign – […]

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us in any way you like!
  Like on FacebookFollow on Twitterstumble uponFlickrPinterest

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42,623 other followers

Visuals to Share
Visitor Count
  • 792,813
Follow us on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: