Sanctions: Fini & Cordesman vs. Luers

Classic example of selective media: practically nothing on a working-level EU official’s defense of sanctions, while word of another imminent Ashton-Jalili session covered all over the place.

According to this report, EU sanctions coordinator Francesco Fini recently told a Brussels audience:

when Iranian negotiators meet with world powers to discuss the international community’s desired changes to their nuclear program, as in the last two rounds of EU-headed negotiations in Kazakhstan, “what they are asking in return is sanctions relief.”

Not surprising  that sanctions are giving diplomacy a fighting chance– after all, the Iranians have been pleading for more talks for some time now. It is therefore untenable that this event was ignored by the same media reps who’ve been gushing all over the anti-sanctions activities elsewhere (here and here).

The Brussels panel wasn’t the only development lately ignored by the anti-sanctions crowd. The CSIS recently issued two interesting reports on the Iranian crisis, but while its military balance document enjoyed quite a bit of media attention, another report examining possible alternatives to sanctions was by and large ignored.

For readers’ benefit, Anthony Cordesman and colleagues have determined that:

“While the US should pursue sanctions and diplomatic options, it must also begin to make hard choices regarding the possibility that sanctions and diplomacy may fail within the next one to three years. This means choosing between containment and preventive strikes […].”

A different way of thinking.

Media reps have personal twitter accounts to promote The Iran Project’s William Luers. As for Anthony Cordesman and Michael Singh – who criticizes Luer’s report  for drawing a false distinction between “diplomacy” and “pressure” – the media has a responsibility to provide them with equal, mainstream time and space.

Blogging & updating on #Iran related news- focusing on Politics, Human Rights & the Iranian nuclear Program. Followed by top Middle East Analysts, Reportes & think tanks.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Iranian Financial Sanctions, Media Coverage
2 comments on “Sanctions: Fini & Cordesman vs. Luers
  1. […] nuclear crisis, Great Britain maintains a comprehensive policy vis-à-vis Tehran. Aware of the increasingly discussed possibility that sanctions alone might not fully stop Iran’s illicit nuclear activities, […]

  2. […] the frustration– the sanctions effort has always been about perseverance and implementation– as we’ve pointed out in the past, Iran is definitely not behaving as if there are no sanctions.  For one, it continues […]

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us in any way you like!
  Like on FacebookFollow on Twitterstumble uponFlickrPinterest

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42,698 other followers

Visuals to Share
Visitor Count
  • 571,100
Follow us on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: