Sanctions Impact, Again

With a brief lull in nuclear talks, the media discourse has predictably swung back to the question of whether international sanctions are achieving their stated purpose. While we harbor suspicions about the repeated media appearance of this issue, we’re game for a relook.

First off: for those who believe negotiations are the key to solving the crisis, the Iranians returned to the negotiating table only because of the sanctions. Fact: their top demand in talks both in the recent and distant past  has consistently been removal of the sanctions, without which they wouldn’t be talking at all.

Since this fact is undeniable – expressly because the Iranians themselves confirm it regularly, and quite publicly – the next rung on the ladder for those who tend to give Tehran the benefit of the doubt is to dispute whether leveling sanctions are at all worth it since the nuclear program continues anyway (they’ve been pushing this line the past few days, but we’ve decided to refrain from promoting them further).

Well, if sanctions are not causing the Iranians to consider slowing down those parts of the program we can see, then why did they convert 20% enrichment into oxide power as documented by the IAEA?  Why are they now indicating a tactical readiness to suspend all such visible enrichment for a limited period of time? (The question of what can be seen and what cannot is the subject of a new ISIS report we recommend reading.)

These facts, and more, seem to be of no interest to some very prominent influentials who together form a critical mass of reportage and punditry. For the sake of simplicity, let’s just call them the Rozen -Slavin-Walt axis – now apparently  joined, judging by relevant Twitter exchanges, by CSM’s Scott Peterson – all of whom for some reason are more than happy to promote the reports and proclamations of NIAC, the DC-based pro-Iran lobby to which we’ve referred in the past more than once.

The only plausible explanation for this herd mentality on the part of such intelligent people is they are blinded by their ideological opposition to the use of coercive diplomacy against Tehran.

Of course, they are not wrong when they claim that Iran’s nuclear program moves forward. This is documented quarterly by the IAEA. But perhaps – just perhaps – there are other reasons, besides sanctions, that are facilitating this development?  A few possibilities, just for argument’s sake: the historically faulty implementation of coercive diplomacy; the inherent weaknesses of consensus diplomacy (ie P5+1); departure from the Security Council route; and last – but certainly not least – the extremely late introduction of international sanctions: four years after Tehran’s illicit nuclear activities were exposed!

Opponents of sanctions – a group which certainly does not include the US Congress– tend to vacillate between their contention that sanctions are not working, sanctions are actually accelerating the program, and sanctions are harming Iranians. We’ve already dealt here with the first two, so we’ll end with a comment about the last one – from a member of the Majlis:

Mehrdad Lahuti, a member of the Majlis Development Committee, said that “The government is well aware of its weak economic performance, though it tries to ascribe that weakness to sanctions.”

Strange, we didn’t see this in any of the anti-sanctions crowd Twitter accounts. Wonder why…

PS – our best wishes to readers in the Jewish world on the occasion of the Passover holiday.

Blogging & updating on #Iran related news- focusing on Politics, Human Rights & the Iranian nuclear Program. Followed by top Middle East Analysts, Reportes & think tanks.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Al monitor, Iranian Financial Sanctions
2 comments on “Sanctions Impact, Again
  1. […] what exactly is news here? Despite the excitement in the media world, we’re going to stick to our guns and reiterate our belief that sanctions are part of diplomacy, and without them there would not be […]

  2. […] surprising  that sanctions are giving diplomacy a fighting chance- after all, the Iranians have been pleading for more talks for some time now. It is therefore […]

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

Follow us in any way you like!
  Like on FacebookFollow on Twitterstumble uponFlickrPinterest

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 41,626 other followers

Visuals to Share
Visitor Count
  • 838,044
Follow us on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: