In an Iranian game of chess, Mousavian is the ultimate pawn

People are still falling for it.  Slippery Seyed is back to his old tricks and apparently has some new fans.  Seyed Mousavian, for those who do not remember, is a former Iranian nuclear negotiator and spokesman for Khatami’s nuclear team.  I have discussed his sophisticated tactics on behalf of the Iranian regime in previous posts, to be found here and here).

In the National Interest, Mousavian recently penned a 10 point elucidation of why “Iran doesn’t want the bomb”.  If it was written by someone else and entitled ‘Why Iran shouldn’t get the bomb’, it may have some practical use.

Unfortunately, slippery Seyed is playing games.  How do we know?  Well, because the action of the country he claims does not want the bomb… does not match his own misleading and tendentious analysis.

Let’s go through the points (quickly), from 1-10.

1)     Religious obligations

Well to put it simply. Khamenei’s mythical fatwa banning nuclear weapons does not exist.  I challenge you to find it; in writing, on any of his official sites. See my lengthier blog post on this precise matter.

2)    No long-term advantage

That is not how the Iranians see it.  The magic word here is “immunity”.  Iran’s leadership has seen how tyrannical, oppressive regimes with nuclear weapons have gained immunity (N. Korea), while those who oppress their people without these WMDS fall by the wayside (Libya, Iraq, Syria…).

3)    Technology Choice

I ask:  Just why does Iran need this technology for nuclear energy when they have more oil and gas than nearly every other country in the world?  Probably because it is not nuclear energy they desire…

4)     Isolation

Iran is already isolated.  Mainly as a result of spreading terror across the region, supporting a brutal Assad regime, and disregarding any semblance of human rights at home.  A nuclear weapon, however, would enable the Islamic Republic to bully those neighbors it had previously merely alienated. And anyway, since when had isolation ever bothered rogue states in the past?  (See this recent claim from a senior Iranian commander)

5)    Aspirations

Mousavian says it himself: “Iran’s ultimate strategy is to be a modern nation, fully capable of competing with the West in terms of advanced technologies…”  Liberal, modern, responsible democracies can indeed be trusted with this technology.  Oppressive, theocracies which stone women and homosexuals while threatening the existence of other countries… well, they cannot.

6)    Goodwill

What goodwill?  The Iranian regime has been caught deceiving the IAEA over and over again during the last decade.  In fact, they almost seem to be in a perennial war with the UN watchdog.  See my recent blog post.  What has changed now?

7)    No Stockpile

Check out this recent summary of the IAEA November Safeguards Report (analyzed by former IAEA officials).  These experts would beg to differ.

8)    Enrichment Offers

Mousavian has a warped view of history.  In the past, when external parties have offered to enrich Uranium in an open fashion (something Iran does not do) on behalf of the Islamic Republic… Iran has refused to cooperate.

Diplomacy, thus far, has been utilized by the Iranians as the ultimately foot-dragging mechanism, buying time, while speeding ahead with their nuclear program.

9)    Deterrence

MAD indeed does not apply here; indeed Mousavian is conversely right in his assessment.  It is his stated causation that is wholly incorrect.  MAD would never work because the Iranian leadership sees martyrdom (a central tenet of Shia Islam) as a positive precept.

They have sponsored suicide terror attacks across the Middle East (and indeed beyond – Thailand, India for example). Iran knows that the US would categorically never even consider ‘wiping’ out Iran.  Neither would Israel.  In fact,

the only country threatening to remove another country from history is Iran.

Once again, the Iranian regime understands the important historical precedent of nuclear weapons serving as the ultimate deterrence; providing much needed immunity for oppressive, tyrannical, theocratic regimes; regimes that have neither legitimacy at home nor abroad.

10)    Forget Regime Change

Once again… Nuclear weapons = immunity for tyranny (at least against external regime change).

Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, tweeting Mousavian’s article, said “these points of view by a very well informed person are worth noting”. 

FM Bildt.  Be careful what you tweet.  Mousavian has been serving the nuclear program of Iran for many years now, and nothing has changed.   I suggest you have a read of these posts before claiming that the points of view this “well informed person” are indeed “worth noting”.  Points of view, President Obama can do without.

Posts can be found here and here

Blogging & updating on #Iran related news- focusing on Politics, Human Rights & the Iranian nuclear Program. Followed by top Middle East Analysts, Reportes & think tanks.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Khamenei, Military, Seyed Hossein Mousavian
6 comments on “In an Iranian game of chess, Mousavian is the ultimate pawn
  1. […] spokespeople in the media (see previous posts about Trita Parsi, Reza Marashi, Hossein Mousavian etc) – as well as those whose articles often appear to be dictated by the Iranian regime […]

  2. […] Hossein Mousavian (about whom I have written extensively) and Mohammad Ali Shabani somehow found themselves with a leader in the New York Times right after […]

  3. […] Tehran’s most hyperactive (and well-traveled) spokesperson. His unwavering position (here, here and here), in a nutshell: remove the sanctions and pave the way to an Iranian nuclear […]

  4. […] same shallow propaganda category as Slippery Hossein Mousavian – about whom I have written on a number of occasions – and his recent remarks at Chatham […]

  5. […] unofficial Iranian spokesperson – posing once again as an ‘analyst’ – Seyed Hossein Mousavian reanalyzed Khamenei’s crystal clear words; Foreign Policy provided the […]

  6. […] true status and the tactics he employed to convince Western influentials and readers that Iran doesn’t want the bomb. Throughout we insisted that Mousavian remained, at the end of the day, an Iranian official on US […]

What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us in any way you like!
  Like on FacebookFollow on Twitterstumble uponFlickrPinterest

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38,857 other followers

Visuals to Share
Visitor Count
  • 1,183,114
Follow us on Twitter
%d bloggers like this: